My client was charged with (DUI Impaired Driving and Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. On the day of trial only one of two officers attended and the crown requested an adjournment. I did not agree and the Judge refused to grant the adjournment which resulted in both charges being dismissed and my client was found not guilty of both charges.
My client was charged with Dangerous Driving Causing Bodily Harm, Assault, Fait to Comply, Aggravated Assault and Obstruct Justice. The matter proceeded to trial and after trial all charges were dismissed and my client was found not guilty.
S.A.- Client was charged with Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. An unreasonable search and seizure application was filed on the basis that the demand that the officer read the client was unlawful, and as a result the crown withdrew the charge in advance of the trial.
If you’ve been charged with driving under the influence please reach out for your free consultation here.
My client was charged with Possession of a Substance(Marijuana), Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking(Marijuana) and Possession of a Prohibited Weapon(flip knife). As a result of discussions with the crown I was able to convince them that the search of my client and his vehicle by the police was not done properly(Unreasonable search and seizure, section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedom), and as a result the crown withdrew all the charges.
My client was charged with(DUI) Impaired Driving and Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. The matter proceeded to trial, whereupon I argued that there were insufficient indicia of impairment to prove the Impaired Driving and further argued that the Crown would be unable to prove the Certificate in relation to the Over 80. As a result both charges were dismissed and my client was found not guilty of both charges.
Z.Z.- My client was charged with one count of Assault with a weapon and two counts of assault. The matter proceeded to trial. All charges were dismissed after trial because the complainant was determined to be incredible after cross examination of her.
If you’ve been charged with impaired driving please reach out for your free consultation here.
M.D.- Client was charged with Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. The matter went to trial. Successfully argued that the Officer read the right to counsel warning incorrectly and as such the Judge found that the client’s charter right to counsel was breached and the charge was dismissed.
If you’ve been charged with impaired driving please reach out for your free consultation here.
A.L.- Client was charged with sexual assault. The matter was withdrawn on the day of trial because the crown was convinced that the complainant’s testimony did not make any sense.
If you’ve been charged with sexual assault please reach out for your free consultation here.
S.A.- Client was charged with Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. An unreasonable search and seizure application was filed on the basis that the demand that the officer read the client was unlawful, and as a result the crown withdrew the charge in advance of the trial.
If you’ve been charged with driving under the influence please reach out for your free consultation here.
W.Y.W.- My client was charged with Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. On the day of trial the crown requested an adjournment on the basis that one of their police witnesses was not available. The adjournment application was opposed. The Judge denied the adjournment and as a result the crown withdrew the charge.
If you’ve been charged with impaired driving please reach out for your free consultation here.
