My client was charged with(DUI) Impaired Driving and Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. The matter proceeded to trial, whereupon I argued that there were insufficient indicia of impairment to prove the Impaired Driving and further argued that the Crown would be unable to prove the Certificate in relation to the Over 80. As a result both charges were dismissed and my client was found not guilty of both charges.
M.D.- Client was charged with Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. The matter went to trial. Successfully argued that the Officer read the right to counsel warning incorrectly and as such the Judge found that the client’s charter right to counsel was breached and the charge was dismissed.
If you’ve been charged with impaired driving please reach out for your free consultation here.
S.A.- Client was charged with Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. An unreasonable search and seizure application was filed on the basis that the demand that the officer read the client was unlawful, and as a result the crown withdrew the charge in advance of the trial.
If you’ve been charged with driving under the influence please reach out for your free consultation here.
Client was charged with Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. The matter went to trial. Successfully argued that the Officer read the right to counsel warning incorrectly and as such the Judge found that the client’s charter right to counsel was breached and the charge was dismissed.
If you’ve been charged with impaired driving please reach out for your free consultation here.
