Tag Archive for: Criminal Defense Lawyer

possession, gun charges, lawyer

Recent Success: Facing Multiple Possession Charges

Allegations

My clients were charged with Possession of a Substance, that being Marijuana, for the purpose of Trafficking. They were also charged with:

  • Possession of a Firearm
  • Point a Firearm
  • Possession of a Restricted Weapon
  • Possession of Weapons Dangerous

All charges against both of my clients were withdrawn as a result of my efforts to successfully convince the Crown that they were unable to prove any of the foregoing charges.

Arrests

My clients were arrested as a result of a radio call made to the police. The call advised them that one of my clients had pointed a handgun at them. The police immediately attended my clients’ residence, where they resided with three other members of their family. Upon entering and searching the residence, the police seized a firearm and an amount of marijuana.

Trial Proceedings & Results

Upon review of the case and the disclosure, it became evident to me that the Crown would not be able to establish that in fact either of my clients had either knowledge or control of the firearm or marijuana.

After having met with the Judge and the Crown on several judicial pretrials, the Crown withdrew all charges.

Above all, it is important regardless of the seriousness of the charges, that the lawyer you hire takes the initiative to review your case and determine if it a matter that can possibly be withdrawn without the necessity of a trial. Donna Pledge has been practicing in the area of criminal defence cases for over 29 years. She will ensure that if your case can be withdrawn without a trial, it will be.

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge

Donna Pledge is a criminal defence lawyer who always does the very best for her clients. Donna Pledge goes above and beyond for you if you have criminal offence charges.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email.

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor 

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario.

 

arrested for marijuana

Recent Success: Charged for Trafficking and Possession of Marijuana

Allegations

My client was charged with Trafficking Marijuana and Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking in Marijuana. Both charges were dismissed at trial.

My client was arrested as a result of a search warrant that was executed at their residence. The police seized a large quantity of dried marijuana. The search warrant was obtained as a result of surveillance by the police of several individuals including my client over a 2-month period.

Trial Proceedings and Results

At trial, I brought several charter applications including an application to have the search warrant quashed. As a result, the matter was thrown out during the foregoing application. Some of the dynamic that went into winning this trial involved cross examining the officer who wrote up the search warrant on inconsistent statements. These statements were made to and from other officers and the Crown.

The lawyer you choose to represent you has to be able to cross examine the officers with respect to the statements they made to the assigned Crown, even if that may be placing the Crown in a precarious position. Donna Pledge has done such cross-examinations many times and is willing to do it again.

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge

Donna Pledge is a criminal defence lawyer who always does the very best for her clients. If you are charged with any criminal offence, Donna Pledge will go above and beyond for you.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email.

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor 

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario.

 

charged with possesion and trafficking donna pledge criminal lawyer toronto

Recent Success – Charged with Trafficking and Possession of Methamphetamines (May 2019)

My client was charged with Trafficking in Methamphetamines and Possession for the purposes of Trafficking in Methamphetamines. Both charges were discharged.

The Scenario

My client was charged with Trafficking in Methamphetamine and Possession for the purposes of Trafficking in Methamphetamine as a result of surveillance by the police over a period of approximately one month. It was alleged that my client trafficked 82 grams of Methamphetamine, and as a result was arrested along with another individual. Subsequently, the police obtained two search warrants to search two residences, associated with my client.

During the search of one of the residences, several items with my clients name on it were found. Located in the other residence was 81 grams of Methamphetamine in a woman’s size 8 Michael Kors boot. The Crown further tried to establish that because my client and another individual picked up a third individual, who later was found to have 82 grams of Methamphetamine in his possession, and drove around the block and then dropped him back off, that they sold him the drug. As a result, the police arrested my client along with another individual for the charges as described above.

Our Process

At the Preliminary Inquiry, the police were called and provided evidence with respect to the surveillance they had conducted on my client and the items recovered as a result of the search warrants. On that basis, the crown argued that there was enough evidence to proceed to trial. I argued that the evidence was not sufficient to get over the threshold of the Preliminary Inquiry and the court agreed and the charges were discharged.

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge 

It is important to have a lawyer representing you – who at every opportunity will argue to have the charges thrown out. One need not wait for trial. I, Donna Pledge, am one such lawyer.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor 

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario. 

Recent Success Possession of Marijuana - Donna V Pledge Criminal Lawyer - York Region

Recent Success – Charged with Possession of Marijuana (January 2019)

My client was charged with Possession for the Purposes of Trafficking Marijuana, involving over 70 pounds of marijuana. The charge was withdrawn as a result of filing several Charter applications to establish that the search warrant executed on my client’s residence and vehicle was unlawful.  

The Scenario 

My client was charged as a result of a police investigation where there was surveillance of my client and two other individuals over a period of a few months. During that surveillance, my client was alleged to have been seen travelling from one address to another and removing bags alleged to contain marijuana. The police obtained a search warrant which was executed on my client’s residence and on his vehicle. As the result of the search, several bags were found in the trunk of my client’s vehicle containing over 70 pounds of marijuana.  

Our Process 

I brought an application to declare the search warrant unlawful and request an order excluding all the marijuana found as a result of that search warrant. During the cross examination of the affiant of the search warrant, it became apparent that there were several inconsistencies, misstatements, and inaccurate facts, in the information contained in the search warrant. The exposure of all these problems contained in the search warrant reflected on all the police witnesses and their evidence. As a result, the crown for the prosecution determined that there was no reasonable prospect of conviction and withdrew the charge.  

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge 

When reviewing any case one must be cognizant of the fact that although on paper, the crown’s case may appear to be very strong, in practice it is very possible to have it dismissed or withdrawn. Even the strongest cases – when tested through cross examination of the witnesses (including police witnesses), expose significant problems with the crown’s case and as a result it may be dismissed or withdrawn. When choosing a lawyer, it is important to choose one that is willing and able to review the case in more depth than just reading the disclosure provided – as this may be the difference between winning the case and losing.  

Donna Pledge is one such lawyer that can win a losing case.  

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor 

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario. 

Charged with Sexual Assault - Criminal Defence Lawyer Toronto Donna V. Pledge

R v K.S.- Charged with Sexual Assault and Exposing Himself for a Sexual Purpose to a 15 Year Old Girl

Charged with Sexual Assault - Criminal Defence Lawyer Toronto Donna V. Pledge

Found Not Guilty

My client was charged with sexual assault and exposing himself for a sexual purpose to a 15-year-old girl and plead not guilty. The matter went to trial over a 4-day period. After hearing evidence from 3 witnesses for the crown and 2 witnesses for the defence, including my client, my client was found not guilty of both charges.

The Facts

My client was travelling to work one morning on the Subway. The subway car he was travelling on was very busy and it was standing room only. My client suffers from severe skin allergies that affect at times his whole body. On this day his allergies flared up in the area of his private parts. As a result, my client wore shorts and no underwear because his penis was swollen and inflamed. During the course of travelling on the subway car, my client was scratching his private parts over his clothes. A woman seated on the same subway car alleged that my client not only exposed his penis to a young school girl but also rubbed his erect penis on her skirt. As a result, upon exiting the subway car, my client was arrested.

The Trial

My client maintained his innocence throughout, and as a result the matter was scheduled for a trial. Ultimately there were 4 days of trial over a period of approximately 6 months. The matter from arrest to verdict took over 20 months. The stress and anxiety that my client experienced during this period was extreme. As well, his family, experienced tremendous amounts of stress and anxiety and financial pressures.

At trial the Judge found, as a result of my successful cross examination, among other facts, that the witness on the subway car, who alleged that my client not only exposed his penis but also rubbed his exposed erect penis on the young girl, was hyper-vigilant as a result of an incident that occurred years before when a naked man approached her. This may have led the witness to leap to a reasonable but inaccurate conclusion. Therefore, it may not have been unreasonable that the witness may have observed my client scratching his crotch and manipulating his shorts such that his penis was visible, but absent any sexual intent. Effective and excellent cross examination skills on my behalf led to my client being found not guilty.

Why Is It Important to Hire a Criminal Defence Lawyer?

Being charged with sexual assault and exposing oneself for a sexual purpose are very serious charges. Both of these charges carry a minimum jail sentence if the person is found guilty. Therefore, it is very important to hire a highly experienced criminal defence lawyer, in circumstances such as the foregoing example, to ensure a finding of not guilty.

If you have any questions about being charged with sexual assault and/or exposing oneself for a sexual purpose, please contact Donna Pledge today. She will ensure that you are represented to the fullest.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario.

What Should You Do When First Accused or Charged with Sexual Assault?

What Should You Do When First Accused or Charged with Sexual Assault?

What Should You Do When First Accused or Charged with Sexual Assault?

What Should You Do First:

If you are either charged with sexual assault or accused of sexual assault, the first thing you should do is contact a criminal defence lawyer in Toronto or the GTA who has the necessary experience to ensure a successful outcome.

It is important to hire a criminal defense lawyer who is experienced with sexual assault charges as soon as you are aware that you are being charged or accused of sexual assault.

Why Is It Important to Immediately Hire a Criminal Defense Lawyer?

It is important to hire a criminal defense lawyer immediately if you are charged or accused of sexual assault because they will make sure are protected. The criminal defense lawyer will ensure that you are not charged at all if possible. If you are charged, that all your rights are protected. But most importantly that you are released immediately after you are charged.

The criminal defense lawyer will make sure the police do not ask you questions. That is very important because any answers or statements you give to the police will be used against you. The experienced criminal defense lawyer will ensure you do not spend any more time than necessary in the police station.

The Potential Negative Effects of Being Charged or Accused of Sexual Assault

There are several potential negative effects of being either charged or accused of sexual assault. Your employment may be affected, depending on the type and your position.

For example, if you are a massage therapist and you have been charged with sexual assault on one of your patients. You can expect that a condition of your bail will most likely be that you are not allowed to perform any massages in your capacity as a massage therapist until the outcome of your sexual assault charge has been dealt with in the court. Even if you are only accused of sexual assault in the above case and not charged, your employer may decide to suspend you until the sexual assault complaint is dealt with or even dismiss you all together.

Your marital or spousal relationship may be affected. Your reputation with your peers is likely to be affected. It is difficult enough dealing with the effects of the charge or accusation of sexual assault whether alone or with the support of family and friends. You don’t have to deal with the legal aspects of being charged or accused of sexual assault. Hire an experienced criminal defense lawyer to help you.

Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Complaints in the Media

We are seeing real life examples of how being accused of sexual assault or harassment can affect the life of the person. In the last few months there have been several sexual assault and sexual harassment complaints against politicians, MPs, television personalities and other individuals in the public eye. These complaints have resulted in these individuals stepping down from their positions and ultimately having a real negative impact on their lives. Other law makers including the Prime Minister have taken positions that perpetuate the effects of these complaints without any due process.

Our judicial system is built on the presumption of innocence. Any erosion of this principle will ultimately negatively impact our society as a whole not just the individuals being accused of these sexual assaults. It is imperative that we as a society remember that if an individual is accused of a criminal act, such as sexual assault, that we have a moral and legal obligation to investigate before coming to the determination of whether the complaint is true or not. Or in the context of a charge before determining if the person is guilty or not.

If you have questions about being charged or accused of sexual assault, please contact Donna Pledge today.  She will ensure that that our moral and legal obligations are upheld

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email.

Donna V. Pledge.

Donna V. Pledge is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty years of experience in the area of criminal offence. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna represents her clients in courts all over Ontario.

Criminal Lawyer Toronto DV Pledge Recent Successes

R. v. A.A.- Sexual Assault X 2, Gangrape and Administering a Stupifying Substance X 2

My client was charged with 2 counts of Sexual Assault, Gangrape and 2 counts of Administering a Stupifying Substance. After the preliminary inquiry I was able to convince the Judge to discharge my client on one of the Sexual Assault counts and one of the Administering a Stupifying Substance counts because there was insufficient evidence to go to trial. Prior to the trial on the rest of the matters I made an application to have all of the charges stayed because it took too long to go to trial, an application to stay the charges pursuant to s. 11(b) of the Charter of Rights. On the first day of trial the complainant was late and an application to have the remaining charges withdrawn was granted.

Criminal Lawyer Toronto DV Pledge Recent Successes

A.B.- Charged With Assault.

A.B.- Client was charged with Assault. The matter proceeded to trial, wherein the charge was dismissed after successful cross examination of the complainant.

If you’ve been charged with assault please reach out for your free consultation here.

Uttering Death Threats

According to the Criminal Code, uttering death threats or making threats of bodily harm to any person is a criminal offence. Threatening to burn or otherwise damage personal property or making threats against any animals owned by a person is also punishable under this law. Uttering death threats and writing death threats either in printed form or online are also illegal. Penalties depend on whether the defendant is prosecuted by a summary conviction or indictment at trial. In order to convict an individual of uttering death threats, the Crown has to prove that the defendant committed the action knowingly with the intent to convey harm to another individual.

Possible Penalties

Penalties for uttering death threats in Ontario depend on the prosecution. Most death threat cases are prosecuted by summary conviction, which requires a trial before the Ontario provincial court. The maximum penalty for a summary conviction is six months in prison. If the prosecution decides to pursue an indictment, the defendant has the right to either settle a plea bargain or go to trial by jury. The maximum penalty for a defendant in a trial by jury is five years in prison. The prosecution often decides between these two options based on a few things. Including the defendant’s criminal record, the personal history between the defendant and the victim of the death threats, and the overall severity of the threats themselves.

What the Crown has to Prove

The prosecution must prove that the threats were made knowingly and with the intent to intimidate the victim. The prosecution must show that the defendant was fully aware of what his or her words were meant to convey. It must be proven that the defendant intended their words to be taken seriously.

The Crown is not required to prove that the defendant was capable or willing to act on his or her threats against the victim. This is a common misconception. To be convicted, the defendant only has to be proven to have made the threats with the intent of intimidation, not actual harm. The intended recipient could also have never even gotten the threats for the defendant to be convicted. The defendant can therefore be charged even if he or she did not intend for the recipient of the threats to see them.

For the words used by the defendant to be considered a threat by the court, the court must determine if the words themselves should be considered a threat by a reasonable person, in the context of the situation between the defendant and the victim. How the words were interpreted by the victim is part of this assessment. The law is intended to sanction against threats intended to intimidate another person. The victim claiming that he or she perceived otherwise innocuous words to be a death threat is not enough. The words used in the threat must be perceived by the victim as a threat, and the prosecution has to establish that the words used were not innocently made or made in jest. This can be a complicated law to enforce, so defendants should seek expert legal advice when faced with this serious accusation.

Trust Your Best Defence

In order for a person to be convicted of uttering death threats, the victim need not know if the threat was made; only that the exact words used were established in court as intended to intimidate the victim. Whether or not the threat could have been carried out is irrelevant. As is the motive for making the threats in the first place. If you have been accused of uttering death threats, contact Donna V. Pledge for the best legal advice.

Criminal Lawyer Toronto DV Pledge Recent Successes

Z.Z.- Charged with Two Counts of Assault and One Count of Assault With a Weapon

Z.Z.- My client was charged with one count of Assault with a weapon and two counts of assault. The matter proceeded to trial. All charges were dismissed after trial because the complainant was determined to be incredible after cross examination of her.

If you’ve been charged with impaired driving please reach out for your free consultation here.