COVID-19 And Your Legal Case - DV Pledge Criminal Lawyer Toronto

Criminal Cases and COVID-19

/in /by

What has happened to your Criminal Charge during Covid19?

The pandemic shut down not only the economy on March 15, 2020, but also the criminal courts. All trials and preliminary inquiries were cancelled during the period of March 15, 2020 to July 6, 2020. On July 6, 2020, the criminal courts reopened for some trials and preliminary inquiries, but they are still, as of today September 3, 2020, not operating anywhere near full
capacity.

What does this mean for your criminal matter?

Effectively, the backlog of criminal cases caused by the shutdown is so extensive it may take years to clear up. If you are not in custody, if your matter is not dated, if your matter is not serious (as defined by the powers that be), if your matter is not deemed to be a priority, you
could potentially be waiting several months, to a year or more before it is resolved.

What can your lawyer do for you?

What I have been doing for all my clients has been to take a proactive approach. I have been assessing each of my client’s cases, and making arrangements to meet via teleconference with the assigned crown, and subsequently with the assigned Crown and Judge.

As a result of my efforts, and my ability to disseminate the weaknesses of the crown’s  case against by clients, I have and continue to obtain not only incredible results, but completion of matters in a speedy, timely and in some cases even before the first court appearance. I have
successfully had charges completely withdrawn including domestic assault charges, drug  charges, fraud charges, and theft charges. I have been successfully obtaining HT A charges and having the underlying Impaired, 80 or Over and Refuse Breath charges withdrawn.

I have been obtaining Peace Bonds and having the underlying charges, some very  serious, for example Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Assault with a Weapon, Sexual Assault  charges withdrawn. Furthermore, I have been successfully negotiating 4 year sentences to no jail on serious gun charges. My clients have been very happy with the results I have been obtaining during these very difficult times.

If you are concerned about your criminal charge or charges you need a very experienced, successful lawyer, such as myself, Donna Pledge, to take care of you and your criminal charges.

arrested for marijuana

Recent Success: Charged for Trafficking and Possession of Marijuana

/in , /by

Allegations

My client was charged with Trafficking Marijuana and Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking in Marijuana. Both charges were dismissed at trial.

My client was arrested as a result of a search warrant that was executed at their residence. The police seized a large quantity of dried marijuana. The search warrant was obtained as a result of surveillance by the police of several individuals including my client over a 2-month period.

Trial Proceedings and Results

At trial, I brought several charter applications including an application to have the search warrant quashed. As a result, the matter was thrown out during the foregoing application. Some of the dynamic that went into winning this trial involved cross examining the officer who wrote up the search warrant on inconsistent statements. These statements were made to and from other officers and the Crown.

The lawyer you choose to represent you has to be able to cross examine the officers with respect to the statements they made to the assigned Crown, even if that may be placing the Crown in a precarious position. Donna Pledge has done such cross-examinations many times and is willing to do it again.

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge

Donna Pledge is a criminal defence lawyer who always does the very best for her clients. If you are charged with any criminal offence, Donna Pledge will go above and beyond for you.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email.

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor 

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario.

 

charged with possesion and trafficking donna pledge criminal lawyer toronto

Recent Success – Charged with Trafficking and Possession of Methamphetamines (May 2019)

/in , /by

My client was charged with Trafficking in Methamphetamines and Possession for the purposes of Trafficking in Methamphetamines. Both charges were discharged.

The Scenario

My client was charged with Trafficking in Methamphetamine and Possession for the purposes of Trafficking in Methamphetamine as a result of surveillance by the police over a period of approximately one month. It was alleged that my client trafficked 82 grams of Methamphetamine, and as a result was arrested along with another individual. Subsequently, the police obtained two search warrants to search two residences, associated with my client.

During the search of one of the residences, several items with my clients name on it were found. Located in the other residence was 81 grams of Methamphetamine in a woman’s size 8 Michael Kors boot. The Crown further tried to establish that because my client and another individual picked up a third individual, who later was found to have 82 grams of Methamphetamine in his possession, and drove around the block and then dropped him back off, that they sold him the drug. As a result, the police arrested my client along with another individual for the charges as described above.

Our Process

At the Preliminary Inquiry, the police were called and provided evidence with respect to the surveillance they had conducted on my client and the items recovered as a result of the search warrants. On that basis, the crown argued that there was enough evidence to proceed to trial. I argued that the evidence was not sufficient to get over the threshold of the Preliminary Inquiry and the court agreed and the charges were discharged.

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge 

It is important to have a lawyer representing you – who at every opportunity will argue to have the charges thrown out. One need not wait for trial. I, Donna Pledge, am one such lawyer.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email. 

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor 

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario. 

recent success donna pledge charged with driving under the influence

Recent Success – Charged with Impaired Driving (March 2019)

/in , , /by

My client was charged with Over 80 mgs of Alcohol in 100 mls of Blood and Impaired Driving Care or control. After a trial both charges were dismissed.

The Scenario

My client was located by the police in an individual’s home after the individual had found her sitting in her vehicle outside of his residence. This individual woke up one morning to my client’s vehicle parked outside of his residence and became concerned because my client – who was sitting in the driver seat – appeared to be asleep or passed out. Other passerbys also noticed my client asleep or passed out in her vehicle and stopped to see if she was ok. Then, the owner of the residence my client was parked in front of, came outside and asked her to come into his house.

In the interim, my client had phoned her mother and a work colleague indicating where she was located and told them that she could not drive. Both her work colleague and my client’s mother attended the residence to find my client passed out on the couch. They became concerned because they had difficulty waking her and called EMS. Upon EMS arriving the police also arrived and after speaking with the owner of the residence, my client was arrested for Impaired Driving and Driving with Over 80 mgs of alcohol in 100 mls of blood care or control.

Our Process

My client initially retained other counsel. My client attended my office to seek a second opinion because her then counsel wanted her to plead guilty. It was her then counsel’s opinion that she would not win at trial and in order to seek a more lenient sentence she would have to plead guilty. After speaking with my client it was my opinion that in fact at the point in time when the offence is alleged to have been committed, my client was not in care or control of her motor vehicle and had in fact put into place a plan to ensure that she would not drive. We proceeded to trial and after trial both charges were dismissed for the foregoing reason.

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge

It is important sometime to seek a second opinion from a lawyer with respect to your case. As in my client’s case a second opinion proved to be not only invaluable but was the deciding factor between my client getting a criminal record and losing her driver’s license and not. I, Donna Pledge, provide second opinions on a regular basis.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email. 

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor 

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario. 

driving under the influence of alcohol donna pledge criminal lawyer

Recent Success – Charged for Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (April 2019)

/in , , , /by

The Scenario

My client was charged with driving with over 80 mg of alcohol in 100 ml of blood. He was arrested prior to the new drinking and driving laws – which came into effect in December 2018. At trial, as a result of my argument that the new laws applied even though they were not in effect when the client was charged, his charge was dismissed.

My client was stopped by the police for speeding and as a result, the Police Officer suspected that he had consumed alcohol and had him provide a breath sample. He failed the road side breath test, and as a result was arrested and brought to the station to provide a breath sample into an approved breath instrument. He provided the breath samples into the approved breath instrument.

However, the first sample he provided was in excess of two hours after he was stopped by the police. Therefore, the crown had to retain an expert toxicologist to read back his readings to the time the Police Officer had stopped him.

Our Process

The trial was scheduled subsequent to the new drinking and driving laws that came into effect in December 2018. The crown called the arresting officer and a civilian witness to testify. The crown also relied upon the opinion of an expert toxicologist. I argued that the new laws applied to this case, which would mean that the crown would have to establish certain facts about the intoxilyzer used in this case. The crown argued that the new laws were not retrospective and that the old law applied. The judge found that the new laws applied and as a result, the crown failed to prove all the necessary facts in relation to the intoxilyzer used. Therefore, the charge was dismissed.

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge 

It is important to hire a lawyer who is familiar with the laws pertaining to the charge for which you were arrested. I, Donna Pledge, am one such lawyer that will always be best prepared for any case and to give my clients the best chance of winning.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email. 

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor 

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario. 

charged for dui donna pledge criminal lawyer

Recent Success – Charged for Impaired Driving and Refusal to Provide a Breath Sample (December 2018)

/in , , , /by

The Scenario

My client was arrested for impaired driving and refusal to provide a breath sample. The matter proceeded to trial, and both charges were ultimately dismissed. The charge of refusal to provide a breath sample was dismissed at the request of the Crown because I brought a section 7 charter application which argued that as a result of abuse by the police officer, the charges should be dismissed. The impaired driving charge was dismissed after trial because there was not sufficient evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that my client’s driving was impaired by alcohol.

My client and two friends of his went out to a few bars on the night in question. My client had only consumed a few beers because he was the designated driver. On the way home they decided to attend the local McDonald’s drive-through for some food. One of the employees at McDonalds, believing that my client had been drinking, called the police. Two police vehicles arrived, and my client was asked to exit his vehicle and was arrested for impaired driving. As my client was being escorted to the police vehicle, he questioned why he was being arrested and in so doing one of the police officers became upset. Then, the police officer intentionally or unintentionally hit my client’s head on the side of the police vehicle and as a result – my client blacked out.

My client’s next recollection is when he arrives at his friend’s place the next morning. We come to learn, through disclosure, that in the interim my client refused to provide a breath sample at the police station and was charged with refusing to provide a breath sample.

Our Process

At trial I argued that as a result of the abuse inflicted by the police officer, my client did not have the intention to refuse to provide a breath sample. I also argued that the actions of the police officer in hitting my client’s head against the police vehicle was an abuse of process and as such, both charges should be dismissed. At trial, with respect to the charge of failure to provide a breath sample, the crown decided to invite the Judge to dismiss that charge.

After trial – on the impaired driving charge – I argued that there was not sufficient evidence to establish that my client’s ability to drive was impaired by the consumption of alcohol on that evening and the Judge agreed and subsequently dismissed that charge.

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge 

It is important when looking for a criminal defence lawyer that you find one that is not afraid to bring arguments that suggest that the police acted inappropriately in the process of arrest or in processing you. Some criminal defence lawyers are fearful of bringing such arguments to the table.

I, Donna Pledge, wholeheartedly believe in providing full answers and defence to all my clients. And if that requires accusing the police of any form of wrongdoing, then that’s what I will do. I am here to ensure my clients’ rights are protected.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email. 

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor 

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario. 

Recent Success Possession of Marijuana - Donna V Pledge Criminal Lawyer - York Region

Recent Success – Charged with Possession of Marijuana (January 2019)

/in , , /by

My client was charged with Possession for the Purposes of Trafficking Marijuana, involving over 70 pounds of marijuana. The charge was withdrawn as a result of filing several Charter applications to establish that the search warrant executed on my client’s residence and vehicle was unlawful.  

The Scenario 

My client was charged as a result of a police investigation where there was surveillance of my client and two other individuals over a period of a few months. During that surveillance, my client was alleged to have been seen travelling from one address to another and removing bags alleged to contain marijuana. The police obtained a search warrant which was executed on my client’s residence and on his vehicle. As the result of the search, several bags were found in the trunk of my client’s vehicle containing over 70 pounds of marijuana.  

Our Process 

I brought an application to declare the search warrant unlawful and request an order excluding all the marijuana found as a result of that search warrant. During the cross examination of the affiant of the search warrant, it became apparent that there were several inconsistencies, misstatements, and inaccurate facts, in the information contained in the search warrant. The exposure of all these problems contained in the search warrant reflected on all the police witnesses and their evidence. As a result, the crown for the prosecution determined that there was no reasonable prospect of conviction and withdrew the charge.  

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge 

When reviewing any case one must be cognizant of the fact that although on paper, the crown’s case may appear to be very strong, in practice it is very possible to have it dismissed or withdrawn. Even the strongest cases – when tested through cross examination of the witnesses (including police witnesses), expose significant problems with the crown’s case and as a result it may be dismissed or withdrawn. When choosing a lawyer, it is important to choose one that is willing and able to review the case in more depth than just reading the disclosure provided – as this may be the difference between winning the case and losing.  

Donna Pledge is one such lawyer that can win a losing case.  

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email. 

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor 

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario. 

Refusing to Provide a Breath Sample - Donna V Pledge Toronto Criminal Lawyer

Refusing to Provide a Breath Sample into an Approved Screening Device

/in , /by

RV T.H.H (May 2018)

The Issue

My client was charged with: Refusing to Provide a Breath Sample into an approved Screening Device. I successfully obtained a finding of not guilty after effectively cross-examining the only Crown witness, the arresting officer. I brought to light that the officer failed to fully explain how to provide a sample. And he failed to check the mouthpiece for any obstructions. As a result, the Judge found that my client was not guilty.

The Offence

Failing or refusing to provide a breath sample into an approved screening device pursuant to S.254(2) (b) of the Criminal Code of Canada, is an offence, whether you verbally refuse to provide a sample, or you fail to provide one by ineffectively blowing into the mouthpiece without a lawful excuse. Upon conviction, a person would face a criminal record. And upon a first conviction, with no extraordinary circumstances such as accident, personal injuries etc …, usually a fine and a period of driving prohibition occur.

Further to the foregoing consequences, a person in Ontario also faces, having to complete the On Track Program and the installation of an interlock device on their vehicle (a device where the driver must provide a sample of their alcohol-free breath at random times, for the vehicle to remain operative). A person’s vehicle insurance will also increase, sometimes to the point of being prohibitive.

The Right Lawyer to Defend Your Case

In this case, my client had initially retained other counsel, who, based on the disclosure provided, advised my client to plea guilty. While in certain cases, it is impossible to give a probability of winning or losing, in some, as in this case, my client had nothing to lose by going to trial and everything to gain. The resolution before trial would have been the same if she lost after trial. There were no incentives to plead guilty. A good Trial lawyer is able to make the distinction between a case that should go to Trial, and one that should not. If you want a good trial lawyer call Donna Pledge. A criminal defense lawyer that has been practicing for over twenty-six years.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario.

Charged with Impaired Driving Toronto

Recent Successes – Charged with Impaired Driving: R. v. J.B.L. (February 2018)

/in , /by

Charged with Impaired Driving TorontoCharged with Impaired Driving and Driving with Over 80 mgs of Alcohol in 100 mgs of Blood

My client was charged with Impaired Driving and Driving with Over 80 mgs of Alcohol in 100 mgs of Blood. Both charges were dismissed after trial.

On the evening that my client was charged he had done everything right. He went to a friend’s uncle’s residence to get together with his nephew who was visiting from away. My client consumed a quantity of alcohol, to the extent that he did not want to drive home. As a result my client’s friend, the nephew, drove him home, and his uncle followed in another vehicle. The intention was that the uncle was going to follow to pick up the nephew after my client was dropped off with his vehicle.

An Unfortunate Misunderstanding

Unfortunately, on the way home the nephew ended up causing an accident. As circumstances had it my client exited his vehicle, from the passenger side first and approached the other driver and apologized. My client’s actions, including providing his Driver License, Insurance and Registration gave the impression to the other driver that in fact my client was driving, which he was not. However, as a result and ultimately against my client’s protestations that he was not driving, my client was arrested for the charges of Impaired Driving charged and Driving with Over 80 mgs of Alcohol in 100 mgs of Blood.

Our Process

When my client came to me the first thing we did was ensure we had the necessary witnesses, the nephew and uncle, for Trial. We had both of them provide written statements that they signed and we filed in my client’s file. Next, we checked for any video coverage from the neighbouring buildings. We were fortunate enough to obtain video coverage of the accident, however because of the distance we were unable to identify who exited from the driver’s side and passenger side of my client’s vehicle after the accident. Therefore, the video coverage was inconclusive as to whether or not my client was the driver.

Therefore, it was essential that I be able to raise  reasonable doubt by cross examining the witness/driver that my client’s nephew hit, in order to establish that he could have been mistaken as to who the driver of my client’s vehicle was. I was able to establish through cross examination of the other driver that in fact circumstances could have caused him to mistakenly identify my client as the driver.

Get the Best Defence: DV Pledge

As such, although it is very important to do everything you can including gathering witnesses and evidence to support your case, it is most important that you hire experienced defence counsel to represent you. Donna Pledge, Barrister and Solicitor, is an experienced criminal defence counsel that could ultimately make the difference between winning and loosing your case.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario.

Charged with Sexual Assault - Criminal Defence Lawyer Toronto Donna V. Pledge

R v K.S.- Charged with Sexual Assault and Exposing Himself for a Sexual Purpose to a 15 Year Old Girl

/in /by

Charged with Sexual Assault - Criminal Defence Lawyer Toronto Donna V. Pledge

Found Not Guilty

My client was charged with sexual assault and exposing himself for a sexual purpose to a 15-year-old girl and plead not guilty. The matter went to trial over a 4-day period. After hearing evidence from 3 witnesses for the crown and 2 witnesses for the defence, including my client, my client was found not guilty of both charges.

The Facts

My client was travelling to work one morning on the Subway. The subway car he was travelling on was very busy and it was standing room only. My client suffers from severe skin allergies that affect at times his whole body. On this day his allergies flared up in the area of his private parts. As a result, my client wore shorts and no underwear because his penis was swollen and inflamed. During the course of travelling on the subway car, my client was scratching his private parts over his clothes. A woman seated on the same subway car alleged that my client not only exposed his penis to a young school girl but also rubbed his erect penis on her skirt. As a result, upon exiting the subway car, my client was arrested.

The Trial

My client maintained his innocence throughout, and as a result the matter was scheduled for a trial. Ultimately there were 4 days of trial over a period of approximately 6 months. The matter from arrest to verdict took over 20 months. The stress and anxiety that my client experienced during this period was extreme. As well, his family, experienced tremendous amounts of stress and anxiety and financial pressures.

At trial the Judge found, as a result of my successful cross examination, among other facts, that the witness on the subway car, who alleged that my client not only exposed his penis but also rubbed his exposed erect penis on the young girl, was hyper-vigilant as a result of an incident that occurred years before when a naked man approached her. This may have led the witness to leap to a reasonable but inaccurate conclusion. Therefore, it may not have been unreasonable that the witness may have observed my client scratching his crotch and manipulating his shorts such that his penis was visible, but absent any sexual intent. Effective and excellent cross examination skills on my behalf led to my client being found not guilty.

Why Is It Important to Hire a Criminal Defence Lawyer?

Being charged with sexual assault and exposing oneself for a sexual purpose are very serious charges. Both of these charges carry a minimum jail sentence if the person is found guilty. Therefore, it is very important to hire a highly experienced criminal defence lawyer, in circumstances such as the foregoing example, to ensure a finding of not guilty.

If you have any questions about being charged with sexual assault and/or exposing oneself for a sexual purpose, please contact Donna Pledge today. She will ensure that you are represented to the fullest.

Call 416-630-8702 or click here to email

Donna V. Pledge, Barrister & Solicitor

Donna V Pledge, is a highly experienced criminal lawyer in Toronto with over twenty-five years of experience in the area of criminal offences. She has been successfully defending clients since 1992. She has earned the reputation of a tough and no-nonsense lawyer who can get her clients out of any criminal case with either a full acquittal or a very light sentence. Donna Pledge represents her clients in courts all over Ontario.